September 2003

 

East Bay Analysis

 

LOCAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS

 
 

GDP SUMMARY

 
 

UNEMPLOYMENT

 
 

EAST BAY SECTOR EMPLOYMENT

 
 

HOTEL INDUSTRY

 
 

HOUSING

 
 

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

 
 

INFLATION

 
    
 Friend's Email
 
 Your Name
 
 Your Email
 

   

 
  

Cities of:

Alameda

Antioch

Albany

Berkeley

Brentwood

Dublin

Emeryville

Fremont

Hayward

Livermore

Newark

Oakland

Piedmont

Pleasanton

Richmond

San Leandro

San Ramon

Union City

and

Alameda County

 
 

 

Contact Information
Anna Wong
Business Development Intern

 
 

EDAB
1221 Oak St.,
Ste. 555
Oakland. CA 94612
(510) 271-5141 anna@edab.org
www.edab.org

Building Resources, Businesses and  Quality Jobs.

Serving the East Bay, the Bright Side of the San Francisco Bay

For more information on the East Bay, click www.edab.org

For archived newsletters and forecasts click www.edab.org/newsletter

For more reports and studies on the East Bay, click www.edab.org/reports

 

 
  

EAST BAY SEPTEMBER 2003 MONTHLY ANALYSIS

The East Bay Monthly Analysis is prepared by EDAB staff to augment the East Bay Quarterly Forecast authored by economists at the UCLA Anderson Forecast. Monthly and quarterly reports may be viewed at www.edab.org. EDAB encourages you to forward the current report to anyone interested and welcomes your comments and suggestions.

For a more printable version of this newsletter, click here.

LOCAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS

(Click here for a printable copy of Bay Area Regional Economic Indicators).

GDP SUMMARY

The preliminary estimate for the second quarter real GDP is 3.1%, revised up from last month's advance estimate of 2.4% and the 1.4% growth in the first quarter. (Preliminary estimates are based on more complete source data than advance estimates). The 0.7% upward revision from the advance estimates reflects upward revisions to personal consumption expenditures for goods and to exports, a downward revision to imports, and an upward revision to state and local government spending that were partly offset by a downward revision to private inventory investment. Major positive contributors to GDP include personal consumption expenditures (3.8%), federal defense spending, and nonresidential fixed investment (8%). Equipment and software grew 8.2%, as opposed to the -4.8% of the previous quarter. Holding GDP back were private inventory investment and an increase in imports.

UNEMPLOYMENT

Conforming to the national trend, the labor market in the East Bay remained weak despite signs of economic recovery. On a seasonally adjusted basis, payroll employment in the East Bay fell slightly by 164, yet the unemployment rate dropped to 5.9%, compared to 6.2% last month and 6.1% the same time last year. August 2003 unemployment rates for San Francisco and San Jose also decreased from the previous month, although payroll employment fell even further from their March 2001 peaks.

These seemingly incongruous trends result from a contraction in the labor force that is outpacing a contraction in the number of available jobs. Since June, Oakland's labor force has shrunk by 1% (4373 employees), San Francisco's labor force by 1% (3679 employees), and San Jose's labor force by 1.5% (7022 employees). Considering these changes, it is unclear that the drop in unemployment rates indicates good news.

 

Payroll Employment (Seasonally Adjusted)

 

Mar-01

August-03

Change

East Bay

1,068,012

1,042,300

-2.4%

San Francisco

1,091,166

967,100

-11.4%

San Jose

1,049,521

860,888

-18.0%

 

Unemployment

 

Mar-01

August-03

Change

East Bay

3.0%

5.9%

2.9%

San Francisco

2.7%

5.3%

2.6%

San Jose

2.3%

7.8%

5.5%

Since hitting their peaks in March 2001, payroll employment dropped 11.4% in San Francisco and 18% in San Jose. Many Alameda and Contra Costa County residents felt the impact of these job losses, as the East Bay is home to over one-third of the Bay Area's workforce.

According to a study released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York this month, the current “jobless” recovery is the result of permanent structural changes in the U.S. economy and many of the jobs lost since the 2001 recession are not coming back. The conclusion of this study seemed to agree with the UCLA Anderson Forecast that the Bay Area would not recover quickly from the loss of 350,000 jobs over the past two and a half years.

EAST BAY SECTOR EMPLOYMENT, Seasonally Adjusted

The Manufacturing sector continued to cut jobs in August, losing 4,800 jobs since August 2002. Most of the other job losses were in trade, transportation and utilities, and leisure and hospitality. The Government sector, which is the largest employer in the East Bay, reported a slight decline in August partly because of the seasonal closure of the Alameda County Fair and summer recreational programs. The State budgetary crisis is likely to exacerbate future employment losses in this sector.

Professional and businesses services showed improvement this month, with 1,400 job gains mostly in employment services. Education and health services, which has increased by 7,600 jobs since August last year, also improved by 400 jobs this month, continuing on an upward trend that began before the recession. Financial service reported 200 jobs gained, reflecting the positive effect of an active housing market and continuing refinancing activities.

For more industry specific employment data, please clickhere.

HOTEL INDUSTRY

The hotel businesses, though still depressed, performed better in July than in June. San Francisco, with the opening of the Moscone West Convention Center, faired particularly well with a 76.9% occupancy rate, up 11.9% from July 2002. Sacramento also improved 16.7% from last year with an occupancy percent of 77.4%. Except for Oakland and Marin County, all other regions had higher occupancy rates in July than the same time last year. Despite the improvements in occupancy, average daily room rates across Northern California were still much lower than last year. Overall, there were no definite signs of the recovery of the hotel market.

HOUSING

The median home price for a Bay Area home rose 6.5% to a four-year high of $444,000 in July. In total, 11,501 new and resale condos were sold, up 13.6% from the same time last year. This is the highest sales count since June 1999. In the East Bay, the median home price in Alameda County reached $417,000 in July, up 3.7% from the same time last year, and in Contra Costa County the median price rose to $394,000, up 14.2% from last year.

Overall, housing activity remains very strong in the Bay Area and the effects of higher mortgage rates did not appear in the July figures. However, pundits warned that the dampening effects of higher mortgage rates might show up in August or September.

The July Bay Area increases were modest in comparison to the rest of the State, however. Statewide, the median price of an exiting, single-family home increased a record-breaking 19.1 percent from $321,900 to $383,320 compared to last year.

The median number of days (Statewide) it took for a single-family home to sell in July 2003 was 27 days, compared to 28 days last month and 23 days the same time last year. The unsold inventory index, an indicator of how long it would take to deplete the stock of available homes, was 2.4 months, compared to 2.6 months for the same period a year ago. The thirty-year fixed mortgage rate averaged 5.73%, up from 5.23% last month and down from 6.49% in July 2002.

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

Continuing the year's first half trend, most new home activity took place in the eastern part of the East Bay, with 277 new single-family housing permits issued in Brentwood, 117 in the Contra Costa Unincorporated Area, and 79 in Hayward. Dublin, Berkeley, and the Contra Costa Unincorporated Area all issued over 30 multi-family permits as well.

 

In July, San Leandro permitted $2.2 million in new stores and $3.2 million in new industrial buildings; Oakland permitted $2 million in new stores; Brentwood $7.3 million; and Oakland also permitted $4.8 million in schools, libraries, and museums. Interest in office construction was concentrated in Livermore and Concord, with the former permitting $7.7 million and the latter $1.5 million. Emeryville also permitted $1.1 million in office buildings.

 

Brentwood permitted the largest amount of new store construction with $7.3 million, followed by San Leandro with $2.2 million, Oakland with $2.0 million, and Livermore with $1.4 million.

INFLATION

Bay Area shelter prices fell in July due to decreases in both rental prices and owner's equivalent rent. The CPI data for Items Less Shelter is a bi-monthly statistic that will be released next month.

 

To no longer receive information from us enter your email address and click on the Unsubscribe button below.

Email Address